Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1896No. 17,716PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Prom the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

By section 23 of the act in force March 6, 1891, known as the Indianapolis Oity Charter (section 3794-, R. S. 1894), it is provided that the Common Council of said city shall have power to enact ordinances for certain purposes therein named, amongst others, “To regulate the use of streets and alleys by vehicles;” and “To license, tax and regulate wheeled vehicles, provided that the funds derived therefrom shall be applied only to the maintenance and repair of streets and alleys.”

*143In pursuance of these provisions of the statute, the Common Council of said city passed general ordinance No. 61,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  2. City of Indianapolis v. BielerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Smith v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. City of Anderson v. O'ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. City of Rochester v. UpmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Lillard v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  3. Sprout v. City of South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. Harkow v. McCarthySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. Desser v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API