Legal Opinion

City of Duncanville v. City of Woodland Hills

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1972No. B-3589PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Civil Appeals has affirmed the judgment of the trial court holding that certain annexation proceedings of the City of Duncanville are invalid. 484 S.W.2d 111. The application for writ of error is refused on the ground that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals presents no reversible error. Although not referred to by the Court of Civil Appeals, respondent presented by counterpoints other reasons supporting the decisions of the lower courts, including the provisions of Section 6, Article 970a, 1 which provides:

Before any city may institute annexation proceedings, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bolton v. SparksTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Red Bird Village v. State Ex Rel. City of DuncanvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. City of Duncanville v. City of Woodland HillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Alexander Oil Company v. City of SeguinTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of Murphy v. City of ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. City of Roanoke v. Town of WestlakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Fuller Springs v. State Ex Rel. City of LufkinTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. City of Houston v. Savely, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API