City of Duncanville v. City of Woodland Hills
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by defendant City of Duncanville from summary judgment declaring its Ordinance 502, annexing certain territory, void.
Plaintiff City of Woodland Hills filed this suit against defendant City of Duncan-ville, seeking to have defendant’s Ordinance 502, annexing certain tracts of land, declared void. Plaintiff alleged such tracts were within its extraterritorial jurisdiction; that it had repealed its Ordinance 41 by which it had agreed to such annexation by defendant.
Defendant filed plea in abatement asserting challenge to the validity of its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Deacon v. City of EulessTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Galena Park v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- City of Pasadena v. Houston Endowment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Murphy v. City of ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Roanoke v. Town of WestlakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Fuller Springs v. State Ex Rel. City of LufkinTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Duncanville v. City of Woodland HillsTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Nassau Bay v. City of WebsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.