Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Shannon v. Hunter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1891No. 354PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

The return of the respondent to the alternative writ of mandamus issued herein shows that he had dismissed the suit in question for want of jurisdiction to hear the same, because the amount sued for was less than $100, and upon this return the questions to be decided arise. Some question is made by counsel as to whether in fact the sum sued for, as shown by the complaint, was less than $100, but, as the view we take makes such question immaterial, we shall not attempt to decide the same. Two questions are presented which it is necessary for us…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BradstreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Ex Parte ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Harrington v. HollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. State ex rel. Keane v. MurphyNevada Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Strenge v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Golden Gate Tile Co. v. Superior Court, in & for City of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Umbreit v. HelmsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Martin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Raleigh v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API