Ex Parte Parker
Supreme Court of the United States
ORIGINAL. ' This was a petition for a writ of mandamus to the Supreme Court of “Washington Territory, directing that court to take jurisdiction of an appeal of which it had declined to take jurisdiction. At October Term, 1885, motion was made for leave to file the petition. Leave was granted, and a -motion was submitted for' a rule to show cause. The rule issued, and, complete returns not having been made before the end of the term, it was continued.
Read the full summary
ORIGINAL. ' This was a petition for a writ of mandamus to the Supreme Court of “Washington Territory, directing that court to take jurisdiction of an appeal of which it had declined to take jurisdiction. At October Term, 1885, motion was made for leave to file the petition. Leave was granted, and a -motion was submitted for' a rule to show cause. The rule issued, and, complete returns not having been made before the end of the term, it was continued. At this term a motion was' made for a' peremptory mandamus. ,.The, hearing on this motion was .continued from time to time until complete…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
This is an application under § 688 of the Revised Statutes for a writ of mandamus, directed to the Supreme Court of Washington Territory, to reinstate an appeal from, a decree of the District Court of the Territory for the First Judicial District, in a suit in .equity wherein Elizabeth Denney, executrix of the estate of Timothy P. Denney, is plaintiff, and Hollon Parker and John F. Boyer are defendants. The decree in question was against'each of the deféndants severally, and the appeal was taken by the defendant Hollon Parker. Upon his petition heretofore, filed a rule to show cause has. been…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex Parte BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
3Cited by33 opinions
- Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- In Re Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Golden Gate Tile Co. v. Superior Court, in & for City of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.