Legal Opinion

Buffington v. Potlatch Corp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1994No. 20367PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDEVTTT, Chief Justice

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Chauncey Buffington began to work at Potlatch Corporation’s Rutledge plant in June of 1959. The noise levels at the plant to which he was initially exposed were minimal. In 1970 or 1971, Buffington switched jobs and started to grade and sort lumber, which required him to stand within thirty feet of five machines called “planers.” Because these planers emitted a high level of noise, Buffington wore ear plugs.

One day in 1972, Buffington noticed hearing loss, tinnitus, and pain in his ears. He allegedly continued to experience the tinnitus and hearing loss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Wynn v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Neufeld v. Browning Ferris IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Miller v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Roberts v. Kit Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roger Carl Gordon v. Shannon Lee HedrickIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. McAwayIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Tupper v. State Farm InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cox v. Hollow Leg Pub and BreweryIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Hart v. Kaman Bearing & SupplyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API