Legal Opinion
Lederer v. Schneider
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 19, 2018No. B276266PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
*512INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Joyce Lederer employed accounting firm Gursey Schneider LLP and its employee Spencer Inada (collectively, Gursey) to manage her finances. As part of their agreement, Gursey purchased insurance for Joyce1 and her family members. Joyce requested that Gursey purchase uninsured/underinsured insurance with a policy limit of $5 million. Gursey actually purchased a policy with a limit of only $1.5 million.
In February 2010, Joyce's adult son, Jonathan Lederer, was in a motorcycle accident that resulted in serious injuries. Shortly afterward, Joyce and Jonathan discovered that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bennett v. Ohio National Life Assurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Bennett, D.D.S. v. Ohio National Life Assurance CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Kst Data, Inc. v. Dxc Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Lawrence v. Cenlar F.S.B.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Smith v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.