Legal Opinion
Wicker Ex Rel. Estate of Wicker v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided July 1, 2005No. CIV-04-308-TPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RALPH G. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Before the court is defendants’ motion [Doc. No. 25] for summary judgment. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, defendants contend that the undisputed material facts entitle them to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiffs claims.
Summary judgment is proper where the undisputed material facts establish that a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). A material fact is one which may affect the outcome of the suit under the governing…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fleck v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Hoog v. Dometic CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024