Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. Dennison

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1894No. 19301PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

On October 21,1891, the defendants gave their negotiable promissory no.te to plaintiffs for three thousand dollars, due two years after date, with interest at ten per cent per annum payable semi-annually according to coupons attached. The note contained this clause: “If any interest or any installment thereof be not paid whén due, it may be compounded semiannually and added to said principal and thereafter bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum; or, at the option of the holder of this note, if said interest or any installment thereof be not paid when due, the whole of said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hewitt v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kinsel v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Trinity County Bank v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Patten v. Pepper Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Griffin v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Union Central Life Insurance v. ShultzIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API