Nordbye v. BRCP/GM ELLINGTON
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Plaintiff, a former tenant of a residential rental property that was financed, at least in part, through the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, appeals. 1 Plaintiff challenges (1) the trial court’s allowance of summary judgment, on grounds of “Chevron deference,” 2 against her claims for injunctive and declaratory relief pertaining to the enforceability of certain “use restrictions” related to the LIHTC program; and (2) the court’s denial of her cross-motion for summary judgment. As described below, we conclude that Chevron deference is inapposite. We further conclude…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Eden Gate, Inc. v. D&L Excavating & Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Wiley v. BergOregon Supreme Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nordbye v. BRCP/GM EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Butler Family Ltd. Partnership v. Butler Bros., LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- DeJardin v. BonfiglioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- DeJardin v. BonfiglioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY VS. MARINA BAY TOWERS URBAN RENEWAL II, LP BONNIE MCNAMARA VS. MARINA BAY TOWERS URBAN RENEWAL II, LP (F-049229-14 AND L-0365-14, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.