Legal Opinion

Nordbye v. BRCP/GM ELLINGTON

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 2011No. 071113782; A141698PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Plaintiff, a former tenant of a residential rental property that was financed, at least in part, through the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, appeals. 1 Plaintiff challenges (1) the trial court’s allowance of summary judgment, on grounds of “Chevron deference,” 2 against her claims for injunctive and declaratory relief pertaining to the enforceability of certain “use restrictions” related to the LIHTC program; and (2) the court’s denial of her cross-motion for summary judgment. As described below, we conclude that Chevron deference is inapposite. We further conclude…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Eden Gate, Inc. v. D&L Excavating & Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wiley v. BergOregon Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nordbye v. BRCP/GM EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Butler Family Ltd. Partnership v. Butler Bros., LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. DeJardin v. BonfiglioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. DeJardin v. BonfiglioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY VS. MARINA BAY TOWERS URBAN RENEWAL II, LP BONNIE MCNAMARA VS. MARINA BAY TOWERS URBAN RENEWAL II, LP (F-049229-14 AND L-0365-14, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API