Legal Opinion
Brigham City v. Stuart
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided October 3, 2002No. 20010479-CAPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THORNE, Judge.
¶ 1 Brigham City appeals from an interlocutory order granting Defendants’ joint Motion to Suppress .Evidence collected after Brigham City police officers entered a private residence without first obtaining a warrant. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 On July 23, 2000, at approximately 3:00 a.m., four Brigham City police officers responded to a loud party complaint. After arriving at the house, the officers proceeded to the back of the house to investigate the noise. From the driveway, through a slat fence, the officers saw two young men, who appeared to be under age, consuming…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ArchambeauCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- State v. ComerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brigham City v. StuartUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- T.Y. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- T.M. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- State v. ChansamoneCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.