Brigham City v. Stuart
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
547 U.S. 398 (2006)
BRIGHAM CITY, UTAH
v.
STUART et al.
No. 05-502.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued April 24, 2006.
Decided May 22, 2006.
Jeffrey S. Gray, Assistant Attorney General of Utah, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Mark L. Shurtleff, Attorney General, Kirk M. Torgensen, Chief Deputy Attorney General, and J. Frederic Voros, Jr.
Deputy Attorney General McNulty argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. On the brief were Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attorney General Fisher, Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben, and Patricia A.…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Roberts; Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Com. v. Edgin, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- United States v. Howard CottermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013