In Re Columbia Valley Healthcare System, L.P.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Medina
In this original mandamus proceeding, we must determine whether a law firm should be disqualified from the underlying suit on the basis of a legal assistant’s work on the matter after previously having worked on the same matter while employed by opposing counsel. We have previously held that a firm can usually avoid disqualification when hiring an assistant who previously worked on a matter for opposing counsel if the firm (1) instructs the assistant not to work on the matter, and (2) takes other reasonable steps to shield the assistant from working in connection with the matter. In re Am.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- NCNB Texas National Bank v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Phoenix Founders, Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Grant v. Thirteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re American Home Products Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- in Re Verna Francis Coley ThetfordTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- In Re Guaranty Insurance Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2011
- In re TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- in Re Rsr Corporation and Quemetco Metals Limited, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
- Hodge, Admrx. v. Urfa-Sexton, LpSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.