in Re Rsr Corporation and Quemetco Metals Limited, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Devine
delivered-the opinion of the Court.
This ' original proceeding concerns whether the trial court abused'its discretion by disqualifying plaintiffs’ counsel because they' “worked so closely” with a defendant’s former finance manager. Treating the finance manager like a side-switching paralegal, the trial court applied In re American Home Products Corp., 985 S.W.2d 68 (Tex.1998) (orig. proceeding), and found plaintiffs’ counsel should have screened him from participating in the case. We hold the American Home Products screening requirement does "not govern a fact witness with information about…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Nitla S.A. De C.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Department of Family & Protective ServicesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Spears v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re SandersTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re MeadorTexas Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Orchestratehr, Inc. v. TrombettaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- in Re Rsr Corporation and Quemetco Metals Limited, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2019
- In re Inppamet Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- BioTE Medical, LLC v. JacobsenDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020
- CMG3, LLC D/B/A USA Foundation Repair v. Ismael Perez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.