Hodge, Admrx. v. Urfa-Sexton, Lp
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
HUNSTEIN, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that a conflict of interest involving a nonlawyer can be remedied by implementing proper screening measures in order to avoid disqualification of the entire law firm. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that a nonlawyer’s conflict of interest can be remedied by implementing proper screening measures so as to avoid disqualification of an entire law firm. In this particular case, we find that the screening measures implemented by the nonlawyer’s new law firm were effective and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Phoenix Founders, Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Columbia Valley Healthcare System, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2010
- Crawford W. Long Memorial Hospital of Emory University v. YerbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- Bernocchi v. ForcucciSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- COHEN Et Al. v. ROGERSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. JohnstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- The State v. MantoothCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- FIRST KEY HOMES OF GEORGIA, LLC v. KOBREE ROBINSONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
- FLAKES v. THE STATE (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.