Legal Opinion

Holte v. Rondeau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 31, 1964No. 5198PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

On the previous transfer of this case here, we held that the plaintiffs were entitled to maintain their actions under RSA 110-A:77 I (supp) as inserted by Laws 1957, ch. 147. Holte v. Rondeau, 103 N. H. 99. The only remaining issue before us is whether they are entitled to recover interest under RSA 524:l-b (supp). This resolves itself entirely into a matter of statutory interpretation.

A threshold inquiry is whether the suits were actually brought against the State, as claimed by the defendants, or against the defendant National Guardsman as an individual and against the Adjutant General, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tilton v. DoughertySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. State v. Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  3. Neilsen v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. State v. Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. Dover Housing Authority v. FeeneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API