Legal Opinion

Schneider v. City of Cuero

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 21, 1988No. 13-87-018-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

Appellants contest the judgment in a jury trial in which they alleged that the City’s (appellee’s) operation of a landfill adjacent to their property was a nuisance and constituted inverse condemnation of their land. The trial court entered a take-nothing judgment and assessed costs against appellants. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The City acquired a tract of land adjacent to the appellants’ property for use as a landfill sometime before the end of 1980. Appellants then sold their land to the Ren-frows. After the City began to operate the landfill, the Renfrows…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Bender v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Ford Butane Eq. Co. v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Montgomery County v. Fuqua, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
  2. Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Wickham v. San Jacinto River Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1998
  4. City of San Antonio v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  5. City of Houston v. CavazosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API