Schneider v. City of Cuero
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEERDEN, Justice.
Appellants contest the judgment in a jury trial in which they alleged that the City’s (appellee’s) operation of a landfill adjacent to their property was a nuisance and constituted inverse condemnation of their land. The trial court entered a take-nothing judgment and assessed costs against appellants. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
The City acquired a tract of land adjacent to the appellants’ property for use as a landfill sometime before the end of 1980. Appellants then sold their land to the Ren-frows. After the City began to operate the landfill, the Renfrows…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Bender v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Ford Butane Eq. Co. v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Montgomery County v. Fuqua, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
- Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Wickham v. San Jacinto River Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1998
- City of San Antonio v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- City of Houston v. CavazosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.