Legal Opinion
Montgomery County v. Fuqua
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided August 10, 2000No. 09-99-492CVPublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DON BURGESS, Justice.
Appellant, Montgomery County, Texas (“County”), brings this interlocutory appeal from .the trial court’s denial of its motion to dismiss the suit brought by ap-pellees, Carlton Fuqua and Randolph Bowles. Appellees filed suit against Kipling Oaks Homeowners’ Association (“Association”) and the County for flooding and drainage problems associated with their residential properties and the roads leading to them.
The County brings two issues. In the first, the County contends appellees are precluded as a matter of law from recovering monetary damages from the County…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Texas Department of Transportation v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Maranatha Temple, Inc. v. Enterprise Products Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Astoria Industries of Iowa, Inc. v. SNF, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Watson v. Dallas Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
- Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset Valley, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Lewis v. Funderburk Ex Rel. Funderburk, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.