Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Deutsche Bank AG
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 12, 2003No. 4:01CV28PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant Stanley G. Tobin’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, with respect to Count IX, which asserts a claim for gross negligence against all defendants. Tobin argues that Count IX fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, as to him, because the economic loss rule bars recovery. The pleadings closed on September 16, 2002, after defendants filed their answers. The matter has been fully briefed and therefore is ripe for review.
I.Standard of Review
Rule 12(c) provides that “[ajfter the pleadings are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sensenbrenner v. Rust, Orling & Neale, Architects, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Bruce v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Blake Const. Co., Inc. v. AlleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Michael Redman v. John D. Brush and Company, D/B/A Sentry Group, Incorporated, and Value-Tique, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Acordia of Virginia Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Genito Glenn, L.P.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maine Rubber International v. Environmental Management Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Mercury Mall Associates, Inc. v. Nick's Market, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Maersk Line Ltd. v. CareDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Maine Rubber International v. Environmental Management Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2003