Legal Opinion
Maersk Line Ltd. v. Care
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 8, 2003No. CIV.A. 2:03CV81PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on three motions: a motion by CARE to dismiss the original complaint, a motion by CARE to dismiss the amended complaint, and a motion by ADM, Inc. (“ADM”) to dismiss the amended complaint. All three motions are pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated below, CARE’s motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and ADM’s motion is GRANTED.
I. Factual and Procedural History
On January 29, 2003, Maersk Line, Limited (“Maersk”) filed a complaint…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alejandre v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Frank Brunckhorst Co. v. Coastal Atlantic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Hanover Ins. Co. v. Corrpro Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Sea King Corp. v. Eimskip Logistics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. JA FIELDEN CO., INC.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.