Legal Opinion
Drakeford v. Capital Benefit, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 8, 2022No. 3:20-cv-04161Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RHONDA DRAKEFORD, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04161-WHO 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON POST-TRIAL MOTIONS 9 v. AND JUDGMENT 10 CAPITAL BENEFIT, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 136, 146 Defendants. 11 12 Defendants’ renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative for a 13 new trial, is DENIED. The jury had more than sufficient evidence to support their verdict. And in 14 light of that evidence and verdict, plaintiffs’ motion for relief under California’s Unfair 15 Competition Law (“UCL”) is GRANTED. 16 BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harper v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Daugherty v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.