Commonwealth v. Nixon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We granted allocatur for this Court to consider two issues. First, we consider whether to adopt a “mature minor doctrine” which would be an affirmative defense to the parental duty to provide care to a minor. Secondly, we consider whether Shannon Nixon had a right to refuse medical care pursuant to her privacy rights under the constitutions of the United States and this Commonwealth. For the reasons that follow, we choose not to adopt a “mature minor doctrine” as a criminal defense and further, we find that Shannon Nixon’s constitutional right to privacy did not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- In Re B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Cardwell v. BechtolTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Fabio v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Stenger v. Lehigh Valley Hospital CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Fc IIISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- In re Brianna B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.