Legal Opinion

Hiller v. Fausey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 2006No. 197 MAP 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

904 A.2d 875 (2006)

Cheryl HILLER, Appellee

v.

Shane FAUSEY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued May 16, 2005.

Decided August 22, 2006.

Howard Jonathan Bashman, Willow Grove, for Shane Fausey, appellant.

Karen Anne Wyle, Pro Hac Vice, Bloomington, IN, for Coalition for the Restoration of Parental Rights, appellant amicus curiae.

Mark Albert Momjian, Natasha Gonzalez, Philadelphia, for Cheryl Hiller, appellee.

Ellen Ruth Wase, Philadelphia, for AARP, appellee amicus curiae.

Karen Coleen Buck, Kimberly J. Krzyzaniak; Stephen Alan Feldman, Jenkintown, for Senior Law Center, et al., appellee…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API