Legal Opinion
Danzansky v. Zimbolist
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 15, 1939No. 7194PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
Appellee was riding, as a passenger, in an automobile belonging to appellant and driven by appellant’s son, when it collided with another automobile. She suffered injuries as a result of the collision, and— following a trial — the jury in the lower court found a verdict in her favor against appellant. This appeal is from the judgment based thereon.
Error is assigned for the refusal of the trial court to strike the declaration and to dismiss the action, because of appellee’s alleged failure to comply with the provisions of Section 2 of Law Rule 14 of the District Court.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States v. BreitlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Miller v. Union Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. HickeySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Duane S. Marusa v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Rong Yao Zhou v. Jennifer Mall Restaurant, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Harrison Richardson v. Thomas E. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.