Legal Opinion
Nichols v. L & O, INC.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 24, 1972No. 42878PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from a district court determination that, as mechanics lien judgment creditors who purchased defendant’s vendor’s interest in a contract for deed at a foreclosure sale, plaintiffs were not entitled to contract for deed payments made on behalf of the vendees’ interest during the year of redemption by the vendees’ mortgagee, who had purchased the vendees’ interest at a mortgage-foreclosure sale. We affirm.
As we have with great difficulty discerned from a wholly inadequate record, defendant L & O, Inc., owned a platted lot o'f land in Dakota County,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moore v. PenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Northland Pine Co. v. Northern Insulating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Parke v. HushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Whitney v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- State Ex Rel. Blee v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of St. Paul ex rel. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. St. Anthony Flats Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Cooley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- In Re Martin Frank Shuster and Carol Sue Shuster, Debtors. Martin Frank Shuster and Carol Sue Shuster v. Richard Doane and Barbara Doane and Production Credit Association of Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin v. Forest Lake State Bank and Mary Jo Thomsen and Donald ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Frank Seitzinger Farms, Inc. of Iowa v. WallerDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1986
- Shuster v. DoaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.