Legal Opinion

Arakji v. Microchip Technology, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 31, 2019No. 5:19-cv-02936Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 MAZEN ARAKJI, Case No. 19-cv-02936-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC., [Re: ECF 18] 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff, Mazen Arakji’s Objections to the Court’s Order on 14 Motion to Remand. ECF 18. The Court construes Plaintiff’s submission as a motion requesting 15 leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s Order Denying Remand pursuant to Civil 16 Local Rule 7-9. MFL, ECF 18.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RezzonicoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
  2. School District No. 5 v. James Lundgren, D/B/A Pacific Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API