Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 25, 1987No. Misc. 87-0297PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) comes before the Court seeking enforcement of an administrative subpoena duces tecum against Blinder, Robinson & Co., a nationwide broker-dealer firm. Blinder, Robinson has partially complied with the SEC subpoena, but now refuses to release certain documents unless the Commission first pays it one-half the cost of duplicating the materials requested.

I

As a threshold matter, Blinder, Robinson argues that the enforcement statutes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Act) violate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  2. Arakji v. Microchip Technology, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API