Stubblefield v. Town of West Yellowstone
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wheat
¶1 Plaintiffs Matt Stubblefield, John Knapp, and Neil Courtis (plaintiffs), police officers in West Yellowstone, Montana, appeal the District Court’s denial of their combined motions to amend the judgment and for a new trial. We affirm.
¶2 We restate the issue on appeal as follows:
¶3 1. Did the District Court err by denying the plaintiffs’ combined M. R. Civ. P. 59 motions for a new trial and to amend the judgment?
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶4 Plaintiffs are employed as police officers by the defendant Town of West Yellowstone, Montana (the Town). West Yellowstone is a small community in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Giambra v. KelseyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SwannMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Johnson v. Costco WholesaleMontana Supreme Court · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Suzor v. International Paper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
- Matter of W.K.Montana Supreme Court · 2020
- Barile v. Atlantic RichfieldMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Thermal Design v. ThorsonMontana Supreme Court · 2022
- Bolton v. Butte Silver Bow Public WorksMontana Supreme Court · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.