Legal Opinion

Barile v. Atlantic Richfield

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 2013No. DA 13-0159PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 Appellants Jody Barile, d/b/a Tripp and Dragstedt Apartments (Barile), and James Kuss (Kuss), appeal the denial by the Second Judicial District Court, Silver Bow County, of their motion for judgment as a matter of law and their motion for a new trial. We affirm.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 Whether the District Court correctly denied Barile’s Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law.

¶4 Whether the District Court correctly denied Barile’s Rule 59 motion for a new trial.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶5 The Tripp and Dragstedt Apartments are located in uptown Butte,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Giambra v. KelseyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Johnson v. Costco WholesaleMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. C. Haydon Ltd. v. Montana Mining Properties, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Campbell v. CantyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Wise v. Ford Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API