Legal Opinion

Hamlen v. Rednalloh Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 24, 1935PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.

The plaintiff in these actions seeks to recover rent alleged to be due for a part of the month of February and for the month of May, 1932, under the covenants of a lease dated July 23, 1926, in which the plaintiff was lessor and the defendant, then called L. P. Hollander Company, was lessee. After that lease was executed the defendant occupied the demised premises until March 29, 1929, when it sold the business which it had conducted in part on those premises to L. P. Hollander Company Inc., a new corporation which was under a different management. On that date the plaintiff, the defendant,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Guild v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Morse v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. 68 Beacon Street, Inc. v. SohierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Boyden v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. Davis v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Maytag Company v. AlwardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. Allstate Insurance v. BearceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Sumitomo Bank of Cal. v. IwasakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In Re Wingspread Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. Pandora Industries, Inc. v. Paramount Communications Inc. (In Re Wingspread Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API