Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Bic Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 17, 1993No. 1:90-cv-10006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
CLELAND, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In April of 1993, this Court issued an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment on all counts and an order dismissing this case. Plaintiffs timely filed a motion to reconsider and a response thereto was filed by defendant on March 19, 1993. For the reasons stated herein,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to reconsider is GRANTED as to plaintiffs design defect claim, and DENIED as to all other claims.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robert Kirk, as Next Friend of Amanda Gryka, a Minor v. Hanes Corporation of North Carolina and Bic Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Burt v. Fumigation Service and Supply, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
- Treadway v. Smith & Wesson Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- Robert Kirk, as Next Friend of Amanda Gryka, a Minor v. Hanes Corporation of North Carolina and Bic Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994