Legal Opinion

Burt v. Fumigation Service and Supply, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided May 21, 1996No. 1:95 CV 459PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on defendant Great Lakes Chemical Company’s (“Great Lakes’ ”) motion for summary judgment. Great Lakes seeks dismissal of the complaint filed by plaintiffs Corrine M. Burt, Duane N. Burt, Darleen A. Dronchi, Joseph Dronchi, Joy K. Router, Irma Rodriguez and Elias Rodriguez (“plaintiffs”) for damages incurred as a result of Fumigation Service and Supply, Inc.’s (“Fumigation’s”) fumigation of a building using a Great Lakes product containing methyl bromide gas.

Great Lakes is a Delaware corporation with its principle place of business…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Arnold v. Dow Chemical CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Romah v. Hygienic Sanitation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Gougler v. Sirius Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API