Legal Opinion
Stuart v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 14, 1987No. Civ. 85-0318 P, 85-0388 PPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Stuart 1 and Danis brought suit to challenge the recoupment of benefits by Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Metropolitan) in an amount equal to retroactive lump-sum Social Security payments received by each Plaintiff. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (1982), 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1982), and 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1982). Because the two cases involve nearly identical questions of fact and identical questions of law, the cases have been consolidated…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lynn E. Anweiler v. American Electric Power Service Corporation and Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Ervin B. Madden v. Itt Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees Federal Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Recupero v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Lake v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Sam C. Gonzales v. The Prudential Insurance Co. Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.