Legal Opinion

DeCandia v. Barry

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 27, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDohoney, J.

The plaintiffs Arthur Decandia and Mary J. Decandia (hereinafter Decandia) purchased a house from the defendants Richard W. Barry and Jean A. Barry (hereinafter Barry.) The defendants Iris Cohen (hereinafter Cohen), Myrna Hammerling and Barbara C. Kolodkin (hereinafter Hammerling/ Kolodkin) and Donald O. Ruffer Inc. (hereinafter Ruffer) are real estate brokers involved in the transaction. Decandia brought suit alleging misrepresentation against Barry, violations of the G.L.M. Chapter 93A against Cohen, Hammerling/Kolodkin, and Ruffer and breach of contract against Ruffer. The Complaint could…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Lantner v. CarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bronstein v. LueckMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API