Legal Opinion
Bronstein v. Lueck
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided January 17, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelsh, J.
This is a civil action for the amount of a deposit claimed by the plaintiff on account of a purchase and sale agreementfor ahorne in North Easton, Massachusetts. The deposit of $11,250 is held in escrow by one of the defendants, an attorney who represented the buyers in connection with the purchase and sale agreement.
The defendants were defaulted and a default judgment entered for the plaintiffs on September 20,1989.
On December 6,1989, the defendant buyers filed a motion to remove default and for leave to file an answer, counterclaim and third-party complaint late. The motion judge declined…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Farley v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Parrell v. KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Bird v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Spencer v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
- Cheng v. CordellMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oxford Business Brokers, Inc. v. MoriartyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014
- Beacon Hill Mortgage Corp. v. RosenthalMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993