Legal Opinion

Hasken v. City of Louisville

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 1, 2001No. CIV.A. 3:00CV-546-SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SIMPSON, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court for consideration of the motion of the defendant, the City of Louisville (“City”), for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The City makes several arguments in support of its motion, each of which will be discussed below.

BACKGROUND

This case involves the method by which City firefighters have been compensated over the last several years pursuant to a series of Collective Bargaining Agreements (“CBAs”) between the-City and the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Metro Louisville/Jefferson County Government v. AbmaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  2. Lima v. International Catastrophe Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007
  3. Sandoz v. CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2011
  4. Hasken v. City of LouisvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2002
  5. McMichael v. Falls City Towing Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API