Legal Opinion

Urick v. Burge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1957No. Docket 19, Calendar 46,854Published

1Opinion of the Court

350 Mich. 165 (1957)

86 N.W.2d 543

URICK

v.

BURGE.

Docket No. 19, Calendar No. 46,854.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided July 31, 1957.

Guy W. Selby (L. James Hicks, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Frank C. Smith, for defendant.

KELLY, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action in equity to compel defendant to convey to plaintiff "Lot 110 of Assessor's Plat of Maple Hill Gardens," Flint, Michigan, in accordance with the provisions of a written lease. The court concluded that the lease did not express the agreement between the parties, and dismissed plaintiff's bill of complaint.

Plaintiff appeals, contending (1) that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Denton v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Goode v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Green v. LangdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Lee State Bank v. McElhenyMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Goldberg v. Cities Service Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API