Harold Jerome Atkins and William Forte v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
Appellants stand convicted on six counts of an indictment charging them with violations of the federal bank robbery laws, 18 U.S.C. § 2113, and a seventh count charging eonspiz-acy to commit offenses prohibited by § 2113 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Appellants urge reversal of their convictions on the grounds that: (1) the pz'osecution failed to present substantial independent evidence of the essential elements of the crime of conspiracy; (2) extrajudicial declarations of each appellant were erroneously admitted; and (3) there was insufficient evidence to convict…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- United States v. Billy Edward Davis, Sr., and Dennis Bates FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Edwin Charles Fortes, Jr., United States of America v. Sandra Elaine JemisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Joseph Armone, Stephen Grammauta, Vincent Pacelli, and Nicholas ViscardiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- The United States of America v. Ralph T. Hickey, Frank J. Graves, Raymond J. Heiderscheidt, Joseph M. Kearns and James GravesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.