Legal Opinion

Mary wade/marla Paddock v. asrs/asrs Board

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2017No. CV-16-0087-PRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE TIMMER,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 The Arizona State Retirement System (“ASRS”) operates a defined-benefit plan for employees of the state and participating political subdivisions, including the City of Chandler. Both employers and employees contribute to ASRS. The contribution amounts, and the benefits paid to a retired employee, depend on the employee’s “compensation” while employed.

¶ 2 The City operates a deferred-compensation plan in which it contributes money for its employees and permits employees to defer additional amounts. These monies are invested and held in trust until…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Diana Glazer v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Amanda Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Fields v. Elected Officials' Retirement PlanArizona Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. David Stambaugh v. Mark KillianArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Cleckner v. AdhsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. Piccioli v. City of Phx.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Kizzen James v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API