Legal Opinion

Peled v. Meridian Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1998PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE, Judge:

This is an appeal from the final judgment entered in favor of Appellee-Meridian Bank in connection with Appellants’ action for breach of contract, conversion and fraud. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. Before addressing the merits of Appellants’ claims, it is necessary to recount the pertinent facts giving rise to this appeal.

On July 1, 1992, Jacob Peled, 1 Harry Car-dillo 2 and John Lovett 3 executed a share holder’s agreement pursuant to which Appel-lee, Paragon, USA, Inc. (Paragon) was formed. 4 The agreement designated Lovett as the president of Paragon and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. American States Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Moran v. G. & W.H. Corson, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Hart v. W.H. Stewart, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Turney Media Fuel, Inc. v. Toll Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. U.S. Bank, N.A. Ex Rel. Bank of America, N.A. v. PautenisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Aldridge v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. B & L Asphalt Industries, Inc. v. FuscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API