Legal Opinion

Green v. LaClair

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 18, 1915PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Trover, with a count in deceit. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the December Term, 1913, Caledonia County, Fish, J., presiding. Yerdiet and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

The declaration in this ease was in two counts. The first count was trover. The defendant claimed and claims that the second was a count for breach of warranty, sounding in contract, and that so there w.as a misjoinder. Before the trial commenced the defendant moved the court to dismiss the *348action on the ground of misjoinder; this motion was overruled and the defendant excepted. But the second count is case for deceit and not assumpsit, and so was properly joined with the count in trover. It sets out as the gist of the action that the plaintiff was induced to take a chattel mortgage upon…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Earl v. TupperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
  2. Moore v. DukeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  3. Hoadley v. WatsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
  4. Inman v. BallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. Roach v. CaldbeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Waterman v. MoodySupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  2. Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  3. In re DexterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  4. Cummings v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Vermont Acceptance Corp. v. WiltshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API