Legal Opinion
Bass-Davis v. Davis
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 2006No. 41015PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*444OPINION
By the Court,
Gibbons, J.:
In this appeal, we primarily consider whether evidence that is lost after being forwarded from franchisees to their franchisor is subject to a permissive inference that the evidence would have been unfavorable if produced.
On August 11, 2005, a panel of this court issued an opinion in this case. The panel concluded that the lost evidence was not “willfully suppressed” but that, based upon the facts of this case, appellant Kimberly Bass-Davis was nonetheless entitled to an inference that the lost evidence would have been unfavorable to respondents, franchisees…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital CorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Marguerite Hicks v. The Gates Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Vodusek v. Bayliner Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. ThitchenerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Lea Ann Tatham v. Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Higgs v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Winchell v. SchiffNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Basic Management Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2008
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.