Legal Opinion

Briscoe v. Ehrlich

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 19, 1984No. 55,190PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Flood, J.:

This is an appeal from a jury verdict finding no damages in appellant-husband’s loss of consortium action. The verdict was reached in a malpractice action against appellant’s former attorney, and the negligence and liability of appellee had been admitted.

Wayne and Kathryn Briscoe were married in 1973 and they had one child. On August 4, 1976, Kathryn was severely burned in a gas explosion. She was hospitalized for five weeks and unable to resume any normal duties and activities for six months. She and her husband moved to live with her parents and her husband cared for his wife and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schmitz v. YantOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Smith v. CovellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Schroeder v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Manders v. PuliceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Waterfield v. QuimbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tice v. EbelingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. West v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
  3. Walborn v. StockmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API