Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Meyer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1913No. Gen. No. 18,345PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Mazzini Slusseb, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barnes

Plaintiff in error and defendant in error were plaintiff and defendant respectively in a suit brought on a judgment note. After entry of a judgment for plaintiff against defendant on a narr. and cognovit, defendant was permitted to plead. He filed a plea of general issue and notice of special matter of defense to the effect that the note in question was given to plaintiff’s intestate for the sole purpose of securing him for having signed as surety certain notes given by defendant and subsequently paid, and that there was an understanding between them at the time of the execution of said note…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harlow v. BoswellIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Foy v. BlackstoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Weaver v. FriesIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Harris v. GalbraithIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Penny v. GravesIllinois Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Handley v. DrumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  2. Cusanelli v. SteeleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. Weinstein v. SprintzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  4. Shinner v. RaschkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  5. Graff v. FoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API