Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Sprintz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 30, 1924No. Gen. No. 28,513PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Jttstice 0 ’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff, as indorsee of a check, brought suit against the defendant, as maker, to recover the face of it, $500. There was a finding and judgment in plaintiff’s favor for the amount of his claim and the defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The record is very much confused, but from a careful consideration of all of the evidence we think it appears that on or about December 8, 1921, the defendant made his three checks, one for the sum of $300 and two for the sum of $500 each, payable to the order of one Greenberg. One of the $500…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foy v. BlackstoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Weaver v. FriesIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Harris v. GalbraithIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Penny v. GravesIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Schultz v. MeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steiner v. Rig-A-Jig Toy Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  2. Handley v. DrumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  3. Cusanelli v. SteeleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  4. McCormack v. CockburnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Hinsdale State Bank v. LytleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API