Legal Opinion

State v. Kail

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 2009No. A08-1081PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSS, Judge.

This appeal requires us to decide whether the state must provide an interpreter to assist during the arrest of, and implied consent advisory discussion with, a suspected drunk driver who cannot hear and speak but who can read and write. After the state charged Kendall Lee Kail with driving while impaired, Kail moved to suppress evidence related to his arrest and to his consent to take a breath test, arguing that the officer’s failure to obtain a sign-language interpreter violated his statutory and constitutional rights. The district court granted the motion on statutory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Linde v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Warner v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Douglas Duane Bahl v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. State v. MartinezNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Douglas Duane Bahl v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. State of Minnesota v. Chad Thomas KarnowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  5. State of Minnesota v. Xa VangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API