Linde v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge
Appellant contests a district court order sustaining revocation of his driving privileges under the implied consent statute. Appellant argues that his limited right to counsel was not vindicated, that he did not refuse testing, and that, if refusal occurred, it was reasonable. We affirm.
FACTS
At approximately midnight on August 10, 1997, Deputy Charles Malepsy arrested appellant Gene David Linde for driving while intoxicated. At the Freeborn County Law Enforcement Center, Deputy Malepsy read the implied consent advisory to appellant. The advisory explains that (1) a driver…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Kuhn v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Eveslage v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Clough v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Groe v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Mell v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. KailCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Busch v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. KoppiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.