Legal Opinion

Linde v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1998No. C5-98-1227PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge

Appellant contests a district court order sustaining revocation of his driving privileges under the implied consent statute. Appellant argues that his limited right to counsel was not vindicated, that he did not refuse testing, and that, if refusal occurred, it was reasonable. We affirm.

FACTS

At approximately midnight on August 10, 1997, Deputy Charles Malepsy arrested appellant Gene David Linde for driving while intoxicated. At the Freeborn County Law Enforcement Center, Deputy Malepsy read the implied consent advisory to appellant. The advisory explains that (1) a driver…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Kuhn v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Eveslage v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Clough v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Groe v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Mell v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. KailCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Busch v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. State v. KoppiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API