Legal Opinion

Pepsodent Co. v. Comfort Mfg. Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 8, 1936No. Patent Appeal 3663PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

This is an opposition proceeding instituted in the United States Patent Office under the Trade-Mark Act of 1905, as amended (15 U.S.C.A. § 81 et seq.). The appellant, opposer, alleged in its notice of opposition that it and its predecessor, since May 6, 1915, have continuously used as a trade-mark for dentifrices the word “Pepsodent,” and that it was the owner of the mark “Pepsodent” which was registered in the United States Patent Office on May 10, 1932; that the said registration covered dentifrices and antiseptics, and that since October 23, 1929, the opposer has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Lambert Pharmacal Co. v. Bolton Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
  3. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Michigan Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. Lever Bros. Co. v. Riodela Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. Sharp & Dohme v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Merrick v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  2. Empire Crafts Corp. v. National Silver Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API