Legal Opinion

Swenson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance Fund

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2009No. 20090138Published

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Timothy R. Swenson appeals from a judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety & Insurance Fund (“WSI”) denying him benefits for treatment of his cervical and thoracic spine conditions. Because we conclude WSI’s findings of fact are supported by the greater weight of the evidence and sufficiently address the evidence submitted in support of Swenson’s claim, we affirm the judgment.

I

[¶ 2] On May 15, 1997, Swenson, 37 years old at the time, injured his lower back while employed as an oil field worker and WSI paid him benefits. He ultimately underwent several surgeries to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bergum v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Swenson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bruder v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Manske v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Von Ruden v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API