Legal Opinion

People v. Maestas

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 12, 2009No. 08SA170PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

I. INTRODUCTION

We issued this rule to show cause to consider whether the trial court improperly refused to accept defendant Matthew G. Maes-tas's knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of conflict-free counsel. 1 Colorado caselaw establishes that the court must give substantial deference to a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to his choice of counsel. In this case, Macstas expressed his preference to maintain Harvey Steinberg as his counsel; he repeated this preference both in conversations with the trial judge and in a valid written waiver of conflict-free counsel. Although a trial court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. People v. ArguelloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. People v. CastroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MunseyColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. People v. RuchColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. People v. NichelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API